TAM CERAMICS LLC

4511 HYDE PARK BLVD, NIAGARA FALLS, NY, 14305
No open violations Compliance record — not a listed provider
Compliance record, not a business listing. This facility is a hazardous-waste generator (it produces regulated waste as part of an unrelated business), not a waste-management vendor — it isn't eligible to be claimed or listed. Data below is shown for compliance transparency, sourced from EPA ECHO & RCRAInfo.

Facility identity · canonical

EPA Registry ID
110000327511
RCRA Handler ID(s)
NYD097649016
Generator status
Large Quantity Generator (LQG)
County
NIAGARA
EPA Region
02
Active
Yes
NAICS
327992
32799
327113
212325
Coordinates
43.127921, -79.038616
Compliance summary · canonical · EPA source pulled Aug 11, 2026 · summary recalculated Aug 26, 2026
3-year compliance history Not in the compliance universe for any of the last 12 quarters
Not in universe In violation Significant non-compliance
Significant non-complier
No
Last inspection
Jul 8, 2025
Inspections (5 yr)
1
Informal actions (5 yr)
—
Formal actions (5 yr)
—
Total penalties
—
Permits & authorizations · canonical
ProgramTypeStatusEffective
RCRA LQG Not reported Not reported
Type is EPA's RCRA handler classification. Permit status and effective date are not published in the RCRAInfo handler dataset.
Violations · canonical · 5 total, 0 open
2 distinct violation categories on record:
CountCodeCategoryEPA description
3 262.A Generator standards Standards Applicable to Generators of HW: General
2 262.B Generator standards Standards Applicable to Generators of HW: Manifest Requirements Applicable to Small and Large Quantity Generators
All violations:
DeterminedCategoryStatusAgency
May 30, 2002
Generator standards
262.B · Standards Applicable to Generators of HW: Manifest Requirements Applicable to Small and Large Quantity Generators
Resolved Dec 5, 2002 S
May 22, 1998
Generator standards
262.A · Standards Applicable to Generators of HW: General
Resolved Jul 31, 1998 E
May 22, 1998
Generator standards
262.B · Standards Applicable to Generators of HW: Manifest Requirements Applicable to Small and Large Quantity Generators
Resolved Jun 29, 1998 E
Sep 16, 1993
Generator standards
262.A · Standards Applicable to Generators of HW: General
Resolved Oct 20, 1993 S
Apr 6, 1992
Generator standards
262.A · Standards Applicable to Generators of HW: General
Resolved Feb 22, 1994 E
Inspection history · canonical · 14 total
DateTypeAgencyOutcome
Jul 8, 2025 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION (CEI) S In compliance
Oct 16, 2012 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION (CEI) S In compliance
Nov 20, 2008 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION (CEI) S In compliance
Apr 5, 2007 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION (CEI) E In compliance
Jun 16, 2004 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION (CEI) S In compliance
Aug 21, 2002 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION (CEI) S In compliance
May 30, 2002 FOCUSED COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (FCI) S Violation found
Jan 4, 2001 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION (CEI) S In compliance
Showing 8 most recent of 14.

Data sources

EPA ECHO — this facility's detailed report — facility, compliance summary, permits, evaluations & violations
RCRAInfo evaluation and violation records for this facility are integrated into the ECHO report linked above — RCRAInfo's own public search doesn't offer a stable per-facility link. General source: EPA ECHO, EPA RCRAInfo.
Compliance, permit, and location data come straight from EPA and can't be edited. Contact info and description come from the business's claimed listing, if any. This profile is not an official regulatory determination.
EPA ECHO Exporter
Source snapshot pulled Aug 11, 2026 · batch 20260811T113837Z
EPA RCRAInfo (ECHO download)
Source snapshot pulled Aug 11, 2026 · batch 20260811T113837Z
Two different dates can appear on this page, and both are correct but mean different things: "Source snapshot pulled" above is when we last pulled that source's raw data — this is the date to check for source currency. "Recalculated" on the compliance summary is when we last recomputed that summary from the data on hand, which can land on a later date than the source pull itself — a later recalculation date does NOT mean the underlying source has data through that date.